Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2012
On Sat Jul 14 06:06:14 2012, rgs@consttype.org wrote: > Do you think the fix is incorrect ? Yes. > It actually cleans up a part of > the overload code that was not symmetrical and sanitizes the semantics > of overload generation. But up until now, overloaded assignment operators have not been symmetrical. Making them so will break any code that implements them. From a user’s point of view, I wouldn’t expect to have to deal with $x += $my_overloaded_object inside a += override. Inside a + override makes sense. If fallback is 0, then $x += $pluseq_overloaded should die. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=114008Thread Next