develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2012

Re: require's error message for "absolute" paths (was Re: almostunreachable code in pp_require)

Thread Previous
From:
Aristotle Pagaltzis
Date:
August 7, 2012 12:49
Subject:
Re: require's error message for "absolute" paths (was Re: almostunreachable code in pp_require)
Message ID:
20120807194908.GB10679@fernweh.plasmasturm.org
* Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> [2012-06-28 16:50]:
> If there are no coderefs in @INC, it seems obvious that the message
> should be the old one, not mentioning @INC. But if there are coderefs
> in @INC, what should be displayed in the message? All of @INC? Or just
> the bits that were tested?

Just those bits, or even nothing at all. But it shouldn’t claim to have
looked where it never did nor should.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About