Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support

I wrote:
> I am in favour of incorporating this patch.  If snorelist proves better
> we can always revert it.
> 
> This patch's advantage is its simplicity and the fact that it is
> already written.
> 
> If nobody objects too vociferously, I might apply it soon.

Actually, I think there is something wrong with the new data.  What
happened to ExtUtils::Miniperl?  Why does it show up in the removed
hash in two places?

• [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by David Leadbeater
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by David Leadbeater
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Leon Timmermans
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by David Leadbeater
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by David Leadbeater
• Re: [PATCH] Module::CoreList delta support by Leon Timmermans