Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2012
On 7/5/12, Aaron Priven <aaron@priven.com> wrote:
> In an earlier message I talked about "in_eq" and "in_==" and so forth, but
> I didn't intend those to be the actual names in use. I agree that the
> convention is that numeric versions of operators use punctuation, and I had
> imagined that there would be one created for "in_==", although I don't know
> which punctuation characters could be used without causing conflicts in the
> parser or what symbols might best signify in_== (although, of course, in
> Unicode there's an "is-an-element" symbol, ∈ ).
<bikeshed>
if ($x ~> @values) { ... }
</bikeshed>
--
Brad
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next