On 7/5/12, Aaron Priven <aaron@priven.com> wrote: > In an earlier message I talked about "in_eq" and "in_==" and so forth, but > I didn't intend those to be the actual names in use. I agree that the > convention is that numeric versions of operators use punctuation, and I had > imagined that there would be one created for "in_==", although I don't know > which punctuation characters could be used without causing conflicts in the > parser or what symbols might best signify in_== (although, of course, in > Unicode there's an "is-an-element" symbol, ∈ ). <bikeshed> if ($x ~> @values) { ... } </bikeshed> -- BradThread Previous | Thread Next