On Mon Jun 18 12:57:33 2012, sprout wrote: > On Mon Jun 18 10:55:15 2012, demerphq wrote: > > On 18 June 2012 19:53, yves orton via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> > wrote: > > > Hrm, this is an unfortunate side effect of how the implementation of > > > C< (?|..) > and (?-1) work together. �The \G is actually irrelevant as > > > without it the pattern matches at a different place and does not use (? > > > -1) to match. > > > > > > I had hoped that named captures would solve this problem, but they > suffer > > > from the same thing. I will investigate further. > > > > I also noticed a weird parse bug if you write the original pattern > > with (?&1) which needs to be fixed as well. > > You mean bug #101666? > Yes, thanks for the pointer. I have now resolved the problem and closed that ticket. cheers, yves --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=112894Thread Previous | Thread Next