Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2012
Instead of arguing about who is right and who is wrong, let's remember that there are others our there who are glad to see us bicker. Bulk88 has a working example. Chip has some insight (not a surprise). Let's marry those two and get to a 64 bit api instead of giving our competitors a reason to be gleeful. David On Jun 19, 2012 6:46 PM, "bulk 88" <bulk88@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:20:21 -0700 > > From: rev.chip@gmail.com > > To: bulk88@hotmail.com > > CC: perl5-porters@perl.org > > Subject: Re: Time for a 64-bit perl API? > > > > Your finding error values for *signed* types as rebuttals was therefore > > amusingly irrelevant, and your inability to correct your own error is, > > frankly, sad. > > > I have no reason at all to correct my XS code. My error was intentional > and I already disclosed it in the XS post. There would be no conversation > without a working example. It is naive to assume that programmer error is > impossible. I am not speaking for myself, but for other less knowledgeable > programmers who might want to work on the perl interp or write XS modules. > >Thread Previous | Thread Next