Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2012
On 6/19/2012 3:16 PM, bulk 88 wrote: >> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:59:14 -0700 >> From: rev.chip@gmail.com >> To: bulk88@hotmail.com >> CC: perl5-porters@perl.org >> Subject: Re: Time for a 64-bit perl API? >>> I dont see a cast in that macro, do you? >> I don't see "unsigned" in those types, do you? >> > You haven't answered my question. Ah well. Fun's fun, but I'm going to stop playing with my food. No more followups to p5p. Your bozo bit has been set. Meanwhile, if you would like to learn a lesson from your exile, please look back in the thread and notice what I wrote: "An error value for an unsigned type, in a properly portable program like Perl, would be ~(type)0 or (type)-1, not bare -1." Your finding error values for *signed* types as rebuttals was therefore amusingly irrelevant, and your inability to correct your own error is, frankly, sad.Thread Previous | Thread Next