Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2012
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:52:22PM -0700, James E Keenan via RT wrote: > On Tue Oct 19 17:21:50 2004, tex@off.org wrote: > > > > > > > > If TIOSCTTY isn't a constant sub it is a bareword i.e. a string. > > > > > > It is a constant sub. > > > > > > > Err, sorry, no coffee yet. I don't think it's a constant sub, it's > > set to &PL_sv_undef, which I guess would be an undef scalar. > > That still doesn't explain why the debugger admits to it not being > > defined but it still following the branch anyway. > > > > Austin > > > > Discussion in this RT petered out nearly eight years ago, and ni-s has > passed away. Is there anyone familiar with IO::Tty who could review > this ticket and see whether we have a bug in Perl's defined built-in, a > bug in that module, or some combination thereof? > > Thank you very much. > Jim Keenan The changes in IO::Tty 1.03 look possibly relevant here. -doyThread Previous | Thread Next