develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2012

Re: [perl #111462] refcount warnings from C<use strict> C<our %FIELDS>

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Date:
April 3, 2012 03:37
Subject:
Re: [perl #111462] refcount warnings from C<use strict> C<our %FIELDS>
Message ID:
CAMoYMM_UYeie_VnJk6zrM5jiwsjF1njDp6k5tCZeaBpky6X0Bw@mail.gmail.com
On 2 April 2012 01:53, Father Chrysostomos via RT
<perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
> On Sun Apr 01 16:53:03 2012, sprout wrote:
>> On Sun Apr 01 14:25:43 2012, rgs@consttype.org wrote:
>> > On 1 April 2012 23:13, Father Chrysostomos via RT
>> > <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
>> > > On Sun Apr 01 14:07:43 2012, rgs@consttype.org wrote:
>> > >> The approach of least resistance would be now to merge dual/Safe in
>> > >> blead and release 2.33.
>> > >
>> > > I noticed that, and was going to change the blead version number to
>> > > 2.32_01. �Which is the better approach?
>> >
>> > What I don't like is to have a fix in 2.32, not in 2.32_01, and back
>> > again in 2.33. But if we go that way we can still ship 5.16 with
>> > 2.32_01 (and your fix) and I'll ship 2.33 (with both fixes) in the
>> > coming days.
>>
>> Sorry, I meant 2.31_01.
>
> But then we still have a fix in 2.31_01 that is not in 2.32.  However,
> the fix in this case does not affect 5.14.

I've merged the branch blead in dual/Safe, bumped the version to 2.33
and released Safe 2.33 to CPAN.

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About