develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2012

Re: [perl #111462] refcount warnings from C<use strict> C<our %FIELDS>

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Date:
April 1, 2012 14:25
Subject:
Re: [perl #111462] refcount warnings from C<use strict> C<our %FIELDS>
Message ID:
CAMoYMM-ONMdRbHZAr6FBsBF_nvW8T4e2yBxstg3bjzYDr+nGMQ@mail.gmail.com
On 1 April 2012 23:13, Father Chrysostomos via RT
<perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
> On Sun Apr 01 14:07:43 2012, rgs@consttype.org wrote:
>> The approach of least resistance would be now to merge dual/Safe in
>> blead and release 2.33.
>
> I noticed that, and was going to change the blead version number to
> 2.32_01.  Which is the better approach?

What I don't like is to have a fix in 2.32, not in 2.32_01, and back
again in 2.33. But if we go that way we can still ship 5.16 with
2.32_01 (and your fix) and I'll ship 2.33 (with both fixes) in the
coming days.

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About