On 1 April 2012 23:13, Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > On Sun Apr 01 14:07:43 2012, rgs@consttype.org wrote: >> The approach of least resistance would be now to merge dual/Safe in >> blead and release 2.33. > > I noticed that, and was going to change the blead version number to > 2.32_01. Which is the better approach? What I don't like is to have a fix in 2.32, not in 2.32_01, and back again in 2.33. But if we go that way we can still ship 5.16 with 2.32_01 (and your fix) and I'll ship 2.33 (with both fixes) in the coming days.Thread Previous | Thread Next