* Brian Fraser <fraserbn@gmail.com> [2012-03-25T19:51:06] > > So it is parse_label that needs to change, but not because of anything > > Zefram did. > > *Thank you* for tracking this down, not to mention all the rest of your > work putting the rest of my mess into shape. I'm currently out with a cold > and covered under a mountain of work, so I'm slightly more useless than > usual; I apologize for leaving you hanging. Yes, thanks, Sprout! And feel better, Brian. > I agree with leaving the \N{...} fix out, merely because it's already > fairly late in the release cycle and this isn't a regression. Good, me too. > The UVX patch can be lost forever, really. The dump.c thread has a > discussion of how to best escape things, and if the format for these error > messages ever changes, that'll probably be the way to go. Great. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next