On Mon Feb 06 05:15:27 2012, nicholas wrote: > On Wed Feb 01 10:58:27 2012, mst@shadowcat.co.uk wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:33:02AM +0000, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:34:00AM -0800, Father Chrysostomos via RT > > wrote: > > > > OK, then let me repeat my two questions: Does anyone want to > > write a > > > > patch for that? Should I revert Darin McBrideâs patch > > (b60dd40238)? > > > Unless there's any reason to do it a different way, I'd vote for: > > > > "Tell us where to look to get a pre-dmcbride-patch version, let > > somebody > > provide a new patch against that, and once that's considered good > > revert > > his patch and introduce the new one." > > Agree, because what we have now is tested, and better than what we had > before. Challenge accepted. See attachment. Patched directly against blead. --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=108470Thread Previous | Thread Next