develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2012

Re: Failure in porting/utils.t

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Todd Rinaldo
Date:
February 18, 2012 22:56
Subject:
Re: Failure in porting/utils.t
Message ID:
6915CA97-C2E3-4E5F-9E86-93B6CC539E73@cpanel.net

On Jan 29, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:

> On 01/29/2012 02:50 PM, Father Chrysostomos wrote:
>> 
>> On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
>> 
>>> On 01/29/2012 01:36 PM, Father Chrysostomos wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Karl Williamson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I am suddenly getting failures in porting/utils.t.  A sample is:
>>>>> 
>>>>> # Failed at porting/utils.t line 81
>>>>> #      got "Use of uninitialized value $mask in vec at ../lib/warnings.pm line 391.\nUse of uninitialized value $mask in bitwise or (|) at ../lib/warnings.pm line 397.\nUse of uninitialized value $mask in vec at ../lib/warnings.pm line 391.\nUse of uninitialized value $mask in bitwise or (|) at ../lib/warnings.pm line 397.\nUse of uninitialized value $mask in vec at ../lib/warnings.pm line 407.\nUse of uninitialized value $mask in bitwise and (&) at ../lib/warnings.pm line 419.\nPorting/bisect.pl syntax OK\n"
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> A bisect yields this:
>>>>> commit 7e4f04509c6d4e8d2ed0e31eaf59004e5c930b39
>>>>> Author: Father Chrysostomos<sprout@cpan.org>
>>>>> Date:   Thu Jan 26 20:43:17 2012 -0800
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Allow ${^WARNING_BITS} to turn off lexical warnings
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, I didn't get that until today, and I have downloaded blead several times since that commit was made, including earlier today.  So I don't understand how it is suddenly showing up.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you need to re-run regen/warnings.pl?
>>>> 
>>>> That’s the only thing I can think of.  Perhaps it got out of synch at your end somehow.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Nothing changes when I run that; so that doesn't explain things.
>> 
>> Does line 389 of warnings.pm contain //, as shown below?
>> 
>>     385 sub import
>>     386 {
>>     387     shift;
>>     388
>>     389     my $mask = ${^WARNING_BITS} // ($^W ? $Bits{all} : $NONE) ;
>>     390
>>     391     if (vec($mask, $Offsets{'all'}, 1)) {
>>     392         $mask |= $Bits{'all'} ;
>>     393         $mask |= $DeadBits{'all'} if vec($mask, $Offsets{'all'}+1, 1);
>>     394     }
>>     395
>>     396     # Empty @_ is equivalent to @_ = 'all' ;
>>     397     ${^WARNING_BITS} = @_ ? _bits($mask, @_) : $mask | $Bits{all} ;
>>     398 }
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> Yes:
>    my $mask = ${^WARNING_BITS} // ($^W ? $Bits{all} : $NONE) ;

Ditto. 

I'm seeing this from warning also from common::sense. Did we ever get to the bottom of this?

Todd
Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About