Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2012
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:54:28AM -0800, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
> On Sun Jan 29 13:35:16 2012, davem wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 01:03:52PM -0800, Father Chrysostomos via RT
> wrote:
> > > If I volunteer to write the new fix, do you mind if I apply my fix to
> > > blead now? I’ll leave the PL_reginterp_cnt hack in sv_2pv for now and
> > > simply repeat it in pp_regcomp. (Removing the hack from sv_2pv has
> > > enough implications to make my head spin.)
> >
> > That's ok.
>
> Here is a patch against the davem/re_eval branch.
>
> You will have to rebase or cherry-pick 8d56929114 and a75c6ed6bbe8 to
> see the effect.
Thanks, now applied to my rebased branch.
> else {
> + if (SvROK(msv) && SvTYPE(SvRV(msv)) == SVt_REGEXP)
> + msv = SvRV(msv);
I also included the
PL_reginterp_cnt +=
RX_SEEN_EVALS((REGEXP *)MUTABLE_PTR(msv));
from your blead version, as I'm not ready to ditch PL_reginterp_cnt yet.
--
The Enterprise's efficient long-range scanners detect a temporal vortex
distortion in good time, allowing it to be safely avoided via a minor
course correction.
-- Things That Never Happen in "Star Trek" #21
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next