On Thu Feb 09 06:13:44 2012, nicholas wrote: > 0: !AvREAL() && !AvREIFY() just the stacks? [and @DB::args > currently] > 1: !AvREAL() && AvREIFY() @_ [and @DB::args should be here] @DB::args *does* have AvREIFY set. > Anyway, I suspect that there's low risk of problems elsewhere if the > Pads > switched to using PL_sv_placeholder for a free slot, as they are only > supposed to be accessed via our APIs, which would never actually > *return* > it. And Pads are already somewhat insane with their manual reference > counting fakery. Thread cloning would have to know about it, too, as @DB::args can end up containing pads. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=109726Thread Previous | Thread Next