Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module

* Curtis Jewell <perl@csjewell.fastmail.us> [2012-02-03T06:53:22]
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012, at 11:38, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:19:57AM +0000, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:55:56PM +0000, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote:
> > > > Find attached.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > Applied as: [...]
> > 
> > Um, wait, shouldn't there be some discussion about this first?
> 
> And I understand it's been talked about for months now, and that isn't
> discussion? Hmmm....

Didn't that discussion last end in this thread:

  http://markmail.org/message/7t3fcs6ry4vy7ljy

...in which Jesse Vincent expresses numerous times his dissatisfaction with the
proposal as brought up?

Did it change since then?

-- 
rjbs

• [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Paul LeoNerd Evans
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Paul LeoNerd Evans
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Karl Williamson
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Curtis Jewell
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Paul LeoNerd Evans
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Paul LeoNerd Evans
• Re: [PATCH] Add IO::Socket::IP 0.08 as dual-life module by Eric Brine