Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2012
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:11:47AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Jerome Quelin <jquelin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Could you elaborate on why .pm files aren't an issue? (Are your RPMs > >> shadowing the core-installed ones?) > > > > because perl already splits @INC to core / vendor / site, in different > > directories (and that's awesome). there's unfortunately only one bin > > directory. :-) But that's somewhat hard to solve, as the perl binary defines where @INC is (and can split it apart into as many directories as are needed), whereas the user's PATH determines which binaries are found. > But please confirm that means you're shadowing, right? "perl-core" > installs to core and then dual-life module packages install to > vendor/site and shadow the ones that built with perl itself? ie the setup is that "newer" comes earlier in @INC than "older", but "older" remains installed on the file system? Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next