develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2012

Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
David Golden
Date:
February 2, 2012 04:12
Subject:
Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases
Message ID:
CAOeq1c8MSAMx9Q1gsEgTk_xUzvH_88Xt=AnEXAQ9MqV3DMq-Bw@mail.gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Jerome Quelin <jquelin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could you elaborate on why .pm files aren't an issue?  (Are your RPMs
>> shadowing the core-installed ones?)
>
> because perl already splits @INC to core / vendor / site, in different
> directories (and that's awesome). there's unfortunately only one bin
> directory. :-)

But please confirm that means you're shadowing, right?  "perl-core"
installs to core and then dual-life module packages install to
vendor/site and shadow the ones that built with perl itself?

-- David

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About