On Wed Feb 01 12:16:47 2012, dmcbride wrote: > On Wednesday February 1 2012 10:58:28 AM you wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:33:02AM +0000, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:34:00AM -0800, Father Chrysostomos via > RT > wrote: > > > > OK, then let me repeat my two questions: Does anyone want to > write a > > > > patch for that? Should I revert Darin McBrideâs patch > (b60dd40238)? > > > > > > In amongst POSIX::strptime(), Socket, IO::Socket::IP, etc... I > possibly > > > could find some time maybe. I haven't given it more than about 30 > > > seconds of thought though so far. Perhaps someone could give me an > > > outline of what .pm files are involved, etc... and I could mull it > over? > > > > Unless there's any reason to do it a different way, I'd vote for: > > > > "Tell us where to look to get a pre-dmcbride-patch version, let > somebody > > provide a new patch against that, and once that's considered good > revert > > his patch and introduce the new one." > > My first accepted patch, already being reverted... :-( :-) > > I used the T::RL on CPAN to create my patch. That will give anyone > with the > appropriate tuits a starting place. One could also use commit 8dcc3739b, the parent of that patch. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: resolved https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=108470