On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:33:02AM +0000, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:34:00AM -0800, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote: > > OK, then let me repeat my two questions: Does anyone want to write a > > patch for that? Should I revert Darin McBride’s patch (b60dd40238)? > > In amongst POSIX::strptime(), Socket, IO::Socket::IP, etc... I possibly > could find some time maybe. I haven't given it more than about 30 > seconds of thought though so far. Perhaps someone could give me an > outline of what .pm files are involved, etc... and I could mull it over? Unless there's any reason to do it a different way, I'd vote for: "Tell us where to look to get a pre-dmcbride-patch version, let somebody provide a new patch against that, and once that's considered good revert his patch and introduce the new one." Although I'd be somewhat averse to allowing his patch to escape blead if we can possibly avoid it. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.