develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2012

Re: whither study()?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Andy Dougherty
Date:
January 31, 2012 12:45
Subject:
Re: whither study()?
Message ID:
alpine.DEB.2.00.1201311538340.25154@fractal.phys.lafayette.edu
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Nicholas Clark wrote:

> But, this is a costly feature that benefits only a few, and by implication
> steals maintainer attention from areas that benefit many or all.

For what it's worth, I agree.  Replacing study by a no-op, on balance,
would likely be a gain for Perl 5.

I'm also happy to observe that this whole discussion has been a fine 
example of weighing costs and benefits of a feature, and striving to find 
a way forward while preserving backwards compatibility.

-- 
    Andy Dougherty		doughera@lafayette.edu


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About