Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2012
On 31 January 2012 16:19, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:02:59PM +0100, demerphq wrote: >> Hash of lines + warning message (format or something). > > I first thought "optree - that's a bugger, that's read only" and then > considered that an interpreter-based hash of script filename and line > would work. But it still felt hackish. > > (Even if I decided that people who had used #line directives to have the > same line appear more than once were on their own.) > > I think you're right with using the format string - I'd not thought of that, > and it's possible that more than one warning might come from a complex > construction at different times. (Given that some of the warnings are run- > time based on the data) > > I suspect that "address of current op" is a cheaper thing to store than > "file plus line". That plus format should be good enough. Ah, nice refinement. I hadn't thought of using the opcode address at all. :-) Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next