Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2012
Re: whither study()?
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Father Chrysostomos
Date:
January 30, 2012 08:46
Subject:
Re: whither study()?
Message ID:
B9BB0529-BBC2-422C-AA8C-1FE63DE5D6FD@cpan.org
On Jan 30, 2012, at 12:23 AM, demerphq wrote:
> On 29 January 2012 21:52, Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> wrote:
>> demerphq wrote:
>>> study() breaks stuff. It is currently subtly broken. It has been
>>> broken for a long time. It is poorly tested. And ive never actually
>>> seen it used in the wild.
>>
>> Does the Perl core count as the wild?
>
> Umm, no. Quick look at the dancing bear! :-)
>
>>> Can we just no-op and
>>> deprecate it?
>>
>> Can you do that without slowing down splain?
>
> Does it really slow down splain?
Er, yes, it does. But I don’t mean what you think I mean. Oh, the irony!
The first two are *without* study. The last two *with* study.
Pint:perl.git-copy sprout$ time ./perl -Ilib -Mdiagnostics -e 'warn "Died" for 1..50000' 2>/dev/null
real 0m10.182s
user 0m9.916s
sys 0m0.062s
Pint:perl.git-copy sprout$ time ./perl -Ilib -Mdiagnostics -e 'warn "Died" for 1..50000' 2>/dev/null
real 0m10.189s
user 0m9.908s
sys 0m0.059s
Pint:perl.git-copy sprout$ time ./perl -Ilib -Mdiagnostics -e 'warn "Died" for 1..50000' 2>/dev/null
real 0m10.263s
user 0m10.025s
sys 0m0.058s
Pint:perl.git-copy sprout$ time ./perl -Ilib -Mdiagnostics -e 'warn "Died" for 1..50000' 2>/dev/null
real 0m10.256s
user 0m10.010s
sys 0m0.058s
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next