On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 09:01:35AM -0800, Mark Overmeer via RT wrote: > * Dominic Hargreaves (dom@earth.li) [120129 15:20]: > > > * Dominic Hargreaves (dom@earth.li) [120128 23:09]: > > > <http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/community/gsoc/project_ideas/maxpath.html> > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:34:49PM -0800, Mark Overmeer via RT wrote: > > > You like to enlarge the default for MAXPATHLEN to an other artificial > > > value, where also a known PATH_MAX is probably too small. So, why not > > > remove the attempt to get a realistic value from the OS here? > > > #define ALWAYS_LARGE_ENOUGH 32768 > > > Char *bufnext, *bufend, patbuf[ALWAYS_LARGE_ENOUGH]; > > > bufend = bufnext + ALWAYS_LARGE_ENOUGH - 1; > > > > As I understand it, you're suggesting picking a different arbitrary value > > as a maximum, and using it even when the underlying system wouldn't > > support paths that long. I'm not convinced that this is an improvement > > on my suggestion. Have I missed something? > > The document you pointed us to, and documents referred to in that doc, > suggest that PATH_MAX/MAXPATHLEN are constants much shorter than > the actual maximum size of the path. > > So, why should the buffer used > in bsd_glob.c be smaller than may be needed? In lack of any useful > constant with a realistic value, we can just pick something huge (in > this context) Right, I see that you're referring to <http://insanecoding.blogspot.com/2007/11/pathmax-simply-isnt.html> which mentions how it's possible to create paths longer than PATH_MAX, on systems which define PATH_MAX but which aren't Windows, but that doing so risks not being able to manipulate the path with anything which uses PATH_MAX. I'm not sure I want to be the one who enables that in perl, even if it theoretically correct. My choice of 4096 was a trade off based on what people seem to expect (because of other systems' limits) without inflating the size of the buffer unnecessarily. In an ideal world, there wouldn't be a fixed size buffer here at all, but in the absence, the minimal change I suggested still seems like the right thing to do. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)Thread Previous | Thread Next