Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2012
* Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> [2012-01-27 12:35]:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >I think that a comprehensive fix should be possible. Note that XS can
> >tell the difference:
>
> Better to distinguish at compile time. Literal "undef" is a different
> opcode from "$undefined" or "$hash{typoed_key}".
Does that mean that a wrapper for `open` would have to do this in order
to provide an undef op?
defined $name ? $name : undef
Ugh.
Or would even that not work because that’s an expression more complex
than a plain `undef`? Ugh.
Please, no.
--
*AUTOLOAD=*_;sub _{s/$/$"/;s/(.*):://;wantarray//substr$_,-1,1,",$/";print;$1}
&Just->another->Perl->hack;
#Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>