Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2012
On 27 January 2012 04:18, Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Father Chrysostomos via RT
> <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't see why "and 0 or more arguments" is treated differently than
>> > "and optionally 0 or more arguments".
>>
>> If we allow _@, then it becomes more complicated to explain why _$ is
>> not allowed.
>
>
> Then what if _@ and _% suggested using _;@ and _;%?
>
_@ and _% sound sensible to me, so I pushed this :
commit 34daab0fa047b2849547189ae5f48b276658af01
Author: Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgs@consttype.org>
Date: Fri Jan 27 10:23:12 2012 +0100
Allow prototypes (_@) and (_%)
Those will be equivalent to (_;@) and (_;%) ; since perlsub already
states that the semicolon is redundant before @ and % this is in
line with the existing documentation.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next