Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2012
* kevin dawson <kevin.dawson@btclick.com> [2012-01-26T15:04:28] > Q1, I know understand my patch was a quick hack, but the issue is > that perl -d will still die, could in not just warn instead? If (as per your patch) perl5db.pl warns instead of dying, variables up until the un-dumpable variable will be printed, but the rest of the variables will *not*. That's no good. If it dumpvars warns instead of dying, with no other change, the diagnostic will be confusingly intermixed with the normal output. This is no good, either. What I suggested was a flag that could tell dumpvars "eval each bit, and print a different marker for each failed bit." It would not halt dumping halfway through, and it would not confuse the diagnostic and other output. > Q2, perl5db.pl still needs to have it's changes added, including > those that did not make the delta. I'll have a look into that. -- rjbsThread Previous