Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2012
On 12/01/25 11:40 +0100, Christian Walde wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:53:58 +0100, Jerome Quelin <jquelin@gmail.com> wrote: > >so, is having a p5p stripped down perl with just perl and (almost) no > >modules be possible? then we ship this as perl-minimal, all the modules > >as perl-$MODULE the way we are doing it for cpan-only modules, and we > >create a perl metapackage requiring all the modules that p5p think > >should be part of a standard install. > > This is definitely possible. > > I think the more important question would be: How would this best be done? > > What is your current internal process for splitting up Perl? i'm removing a few pieces that will be shipped in perl-$DUAL (the ones that ship a script and therefore will conflict), then am building perl, then list which files go in which package. jérômeThread Previous | Thread Next