develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2012

Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Jerome Quelin
January 26, 2012 04:29
Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases
Message ID:
On 12/01/25 11:40 +0100, Christian Walde wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:53:58 +0100, Jerome Quelin <> wrote:
> >so, is having a p5p stripped down perl with just perl and (almost) no
> >modules be possible? then we ship this as perl-minimal, all the modules
> >as perl-$MODULE the way we are doing it for cpan-only modules, and we
> >create a perl metapackage requiring all the modules that p5p think
> >should be part of a standard install.
> This is definitely possible.
> I think the more important question would be: How would this best be done?
> What is your current internal process for splitting up Perl?

i'm removing a few pieces that will be shipped in perl-$DUAL (the ones
that ship a script and therefore will conflict), then am building perl,
then list which files go in which package.


Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About