Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2012
On 24 January 2012 03:03, Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote:
> * Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> [2012-01-22T17:50:54]
>> Is the overloading pragma new enough to change without breaking things?
>
> Making "do { no overloading; qr{foo} }" return a Regexp=REGEXP(..) string is a
> bug fix.
Just curious, but is that a ruling-from-on-high, or is it a fact?
I really do wonder if no overloading in earlier perls would have
behaved as you describe.
This is of course totally orthagonal to this being a bug.
Yves
--
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next