On 24 January 2012 03:03, Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > * Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> [2012-01-22T17:50:54] >> Is the overloading pragma new enough to change without breaking things? > > Making "do { no overloading; qr{foo} }" return a Regexp=REGEXP(..) string is a > bug fix. Just curious, but is that a ruling-from-on-high, or is it a fact? I really do wonder if no overloading in earlier perls would have behaved as you describe. This is of course totally orthagonal to this being a bug. Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next