develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2012

Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
January 25, 2012 05:09
Subject:
Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases
Message ID:
20120125130929.GN9069@plum.flirble.org
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 01:03:53PM +0100, Christian Walde wrote:

> No, no access to the package management in the first place. Without that
> you can, with a full core perl, still do anything you could want to do,
> easily (local::lib, carton, perlbrew). With a cut-down perl however you
> end up having to bootstrap your way up tediously and manually.

That's a useful insight.

In that it should be possible to cut things down in a way that the existing
toolchain can bootstrap up from it just fine.

(For starters, this means that everything that "goes" needs to be dual life,
not just in lib/ or ext/)

Whereas if one is not aware of this when thinking how to cut things down,
one might make a small change that prevents it.

Nicholas Clark

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About