develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2012

Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Christian Walde
Date:
January 25, 2012 02:40
Subject:
Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases
Message ID:
op.v8myk9kfn4yvrm@digitizedsqueak
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:53:58 +0100, Jerome Quelin <jquelin@gmail.com> wrote:

> so, is having a p5p stripped down perl with just perl and (almost) no
> modules be possible? then we ship this as perl-minimal, all the modules
> as perl-$MODULE the way we are doing it for cpan-only modules, and we
> create a perl metapackage requiring all the modules that p5p think
> should be part of a standard install.

This is definitely possible.

I think the more important question would be: How would this best be done?

What is your current internal process for splitting up Perl?

-- 
With regards,
Christian Walde
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About