develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2012

Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases

Thread Previous
Ricardo Signes
January 24, 2012 08:03
Re: Reaction to Redhat/Fedora modified releases
Message ID:
* demerphq <> [2012-01-24T10:57:50]
> On 24 January 2012 16:49, David Golden <> wrote:
> > (b) p5p should finally bite the bullet and write the spec for "minimal
> > perl" (whatever we finally think that is) and we should then offer
> > that to packagers as a sanctioned minimal distribution as a compromise
> > to response (a).  We should also be clear about binary package naming
> > -- i.e. a minimal perl should not be packaged as "perl".
> Absolutely agree. This is the productive path. Lets get our house in
> order before we complain about others.

Yes.  This is what we're doing.


Thread Previous Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About