On Mon Jan 23 18:28:42 2012, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: > * Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2012-01- > 21T20:04:11] > > On Fri Jan 20 16:25:43 2012, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: > > > * Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2012-01- > > > 20T17:13:33] > > > > > > > > (Is anybody reading this?) > > > > > > Yes, and it's an area I've grumbled through myself. I'll try to > say > > > something tomorrow. > > > > And when you do so, can you consider the attached patch? It just > makes > > -t -e -f -l -o N dwim, because the N argument is now passed down to > each > > op. Those that are capable will use the last stat buffer. Those > that > > are not (-t -T -B) will use the argument. > > This seems like a change for the better to me. Thanks for your > patience. > A modified version of it is now applied as 8db8f6b. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77388Thread Previous