* Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2012-01-21T20:04:11] > On Fri Jan 20 16:25:43 2012, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: > > * Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2012-01- > > 20T17:13:33] > > > > > > (Is anybody reading this?) > > > > Yes, and it's an area I've grumbled through myself. I'll try to say > > something tomorrow. > > And when you do so, can you consider the attached patch? It just makes > -t -e -f -l -o N dwim, because the N argument is now passed down to each > op. Those that are capable will use the last stat buffer. Those that > are not (-t -T -B) will use the argument. This seems like a change for the better to me. Thanks for your patience. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next