On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Vladimir V. Perepelitsa <inthrax@gmail.com> wrote: > You abuse Marc's module, so he insert a protection from abusing. Define 'abusing': AFAIK Paul didn't actually break anyone else's code, which would be the only argument that would impress me. If you define abuse as «doing something with a piece of code that the author hadn't envisioned», then I'll gladly be an abuser of code ;-) Leon