Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2012
On Jan 6, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> Is there a reason these two evals are commented out? For me the new
> tests fail like:
>
> ok 165 - AUTOLOAD with stubref
> not ok 166 - (sort) does not die
> # Failed at [.op]sort.t line 955
> # got "Modification of a read-only value attempted at [.op]sort.t
> line 791.\n"
> # expected ""
> ok 167 - (sort) returns empty list
> not ok 168 - sort; does not die
> # Failed at [.op]sort.t line 958
> # got "Modification of a read-only value attempted at [.op]sort.t
> line 791.\n"
> # expected ""
> ok 169 - sort; returns empty list
> ok 170 - {sort} does not die
> ok 171 - {sort} returns empty list
>
> because $@ has something left over from a much earlier test.
> Uncommenting the evals makes the tests pass but in case they were
> commented out for a reason, I thought I'd ask before changing them.
Sorry, that was a mistake. I’ve just corrected it.
Thread Previous