On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Father Chrysostomos via RT < perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > On Fri Dec 16 11:26:15 2011, ikegami@adaelis.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The text of the opening post (below) describes patches #2 and #3. > > > > Patch #1 changes two C<< exist($_[1]) >> to C<< @_ >= 2 >>. Any > > objections > > to that? They aren't part of tests for exists($a[]) or delete($a[]). > > I actually think the code reads more clearly with the exists() form. > But it's not valid code according to the documentation. Are you saying the documentation should be changed?Thread Previous | Thread Next