On 2011-11-23 18:54, Tom Christiansen wrote: > Jesse Luehrs<doy@tozt.net> wrote > on Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:27:27 CST: >> Well, if nothing else, it's a potentially unnecessary use of >> ~500kb/process. > > Ouch! That's good enough for me. Well, or used to be. Guido > recently told the Python folks that having to load 500k of Unicode > properties to get regexes to work right on Unicode data didn't > really bother him much, and I tend to agree with him. I vaguely remember having implemented it well within 100 kB. (I assume that the '500kb' wasn't meant as '500 kilobits') I will search and dig it up, and report if it still stands. -- RuudThread Previous | Thread Next