develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from September 2011

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.15.3-33-g0f8d4b5 FAIL(F) linux2.6.38-11-generic [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
September 27, 2011 12:41
Subject:
Re: Smoke [blead] v5.15.3-33-g0f8d4b5 FAIL(F) linux2.6.38-11-generic [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu)
Message ID:
20110927194127.GQ23881@plum.flirble.org
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 04:34:12PM -0600, Karl Williamson wrote:

> I do a 'make test_harness' for my local testing.  I'm having trouble 
> grokking why harness would allow incorrect TAP output, and TEST 
> wouldn't; nor is it documented AFAICT.  Is there a reason for this 
> besides tuitlessness?  I would have thought the two things would try 
> hard to have consistent pass/fail results; leaving only weird cases 
> where they would differ.

I *think* that TEST is actually stricter than harness. I don't know if
it's possible to ask Test::Harness to be stricter in its parsing of TAP.
[I guess therefore that yes, it's tuitlessness]. I think that having
t/harness be as strict as possible would be beneficial, at least for
development versions.

Nicholas Clark

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About