On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> wrote: > >> According to the 5.14.1 docs, it shouldn't match. >> >> Note that if [the (*PRUNE)] operator is used and NOT inside of an >> alternation then it acts exactly like the (*PRUNE) operator. >> > > Oops, that should be (*NEXT) at the beginning. > ARGH! (*THEN)Thread Previous | Thread Next