develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from September 2011

Re: The future of POSIX in core

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
David Golden
Date:
September 2, 2011 18:19
Subject:
Re: The future of POSIX in core
Message ID:
CAOeq1c9aGLZcVjCtERw+hYeYGYg4WYN3_0rACaW16z6G2mmcWg@mail.gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> wrote:
>> I don't think it's a problem to warn on stuff that is discovered to be
>> demonstrably broken.
>
> There's broken, and there's broken.
>
> I think it's a problem to always warn if you use a function that displays
> "broken" behaviour when used in uncommon ways, or only on specific inputs.
>
> For instance, I would not support warning on:
>
>    POSIX::exit (1);

I agree.  I was thinking of the string functions that are not utf8 friendly.

-- David

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About