On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Mark Overmeer <mark@overmeer.net> wrote: > Counting back from Feb/2012 there must be a moment not too far away > when the user-visible changes get frozen. So, about when? > > The whole purpose of this thread was to check with "Core" what would > be the best way to get the changes into 5.16. Where goes what. Still > not completely sure where the consensus will get us. For Perl 5.14, the "contentious change" freeze was late December 2010. The "user-visible change" freeze was late Feb 2011. The "hard" freeze to start the RC cycle was late March 2011. I haven't seen anybody object to a documentation patch for POSIX.pm. I would suggest submitting that as a distinct patch. I will commit to personally reviewing it and providing feedback (or else I will just commit it if I think it's close enough). I have no objection to splitting out POSIX::SigAction and POSIX::SigRT into separate .pm files that are used by POSIX.pm. (I.e. loading POSIX should load those also.) I would accept a patch for that. I don't hear consensus for changing the POSIX @EXPORT API. I think that is not going to get sufficient support. There is the outstanding proposal for applying the correct prototypes to POSIX clones of Perl functions. Given the disagreement, I think we need Jesse to make a call. I suggest creating a new thread on that topic specifically and ask him to render judgment. Are there any other issues outstanding? -- DavidThread Previous | Thread Next