Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2011
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:01:12AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:09:30PM -0700, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
> > > Caused by this commit, but that doesn???t look like very useful
> > > information. Does the branch from which the threads changes were merged
> > > still exist, so I can try and find a description of the change (it added
> > > Perl_shared_object_destroy)?
> >
> > That's odd; the commit you show is from the 5.10 maint branch; not sure
> > how a bisect ended up there. That commit (done under perforce) is the
>
> He doesn't have the graft that removes the mistaken merge?
I don't have the graft either; I've never bothered with them
> [I can't remember the details, I suspect you can.]
The only graft-worthy thing I can remember off the top of my head is the
fact that the perl-5.10.0 tag actually tags the first commit on the
maint-5.10 branch, and that perl-5.10.0^ actually corresponds to the
5.10.0 release; the alternative tag v5.10.0 is correct.
--
The Enterprise's efficient long-range scanners detect a temporal vortex
distortion in good time, allowing it to be safely avoided via a minor
course correction.
-- Things That Never Happen in "Star Trek" #21
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next