On Thu, 01 Sep 2011, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Steve Hay <SteveHay@planit.com> wrote: > > Unless someone with a recent, full version of "C++ Builder" can tell > > us that *that* works, and is willing to help maintain it in the > > future, then it now seems pointless to me to carry on with just that > > old free version, especially given that Microsoft have been making > > all their compilers freely available for a long time now. > > +1 +1 from me too. I've said for many years that I don't care about the old Borland compiler, and that it is only supported because Steve cares about it. I don't think it serves any useful purpose, given that we have GCC as a free compiler option that works well. Cheers, -JanThread Previous | Thread Next