develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2011

Re: Predeclaration vs. scalar types - no worries

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Steffen Mueller
August 14, 2011 03:31
Re: Predeclaration vs. scalar types - no worries
Message ID:
On 08/14/2011 11:50 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:35:33PM +0200, Steffen Mueller wrote:
>> On 08/13/2011 06:23 PM, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Nicholas Clark<>   wrote:
>>>> I'd feel a lot calmer if someone were able to test build CPAN (ie as much
>>>> of it as possible for their OS etc) and compare this branch to blead
>>> That's a test I had planned anyway.  It's been done before; is there a
>>> test harness already, or did everyone make it up as they went?
>> This was a lot of work and I would rather not do that again. If I had
>> to, I'd most certainly try to automate more.
>> One obvious way to try to improve the process would be to have the same
>> machine smoke both branches and then look at only the dists where the
>> result is different.
> That seems like a very good way to go.
> Also, I fear that this particular plan of Chip's would really benefit
> from being smoked on CPAN (at least) tice. Once with -DDEBUGGING to
> enable assertions, to catch assumptions in CPAN code analogous to

Okay. If somebody teaches me how to set up a CPAN smoker, I'll do that 
stuff once more, hopefully more cleverly this time. This is one of those 
cases where I'm fairly certain I'll regret volunteering. :)


> and once with full-on optimisation, to try to tickle crashes caused by
> anything else.
> [and possibly also with/without threads]
> Maybe I'm too paranoid. Or maybe that's just what the bugs want me to think.

Just keep the cost of these tests in mind. We only have limited 
resources of people willing and able to do them.


Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About