Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2011
Correction: On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Chip Salzenberg <rev.chip@gmail.com> wrote: > given the minimal copy logic solves the actual problem with fat SVs, I > suppose I could just put sv_yes and sv_no back the way they were > Actually, I could (and probably should) tweak the minimal copy so that a fat sv_yes/sv_no wouldn't propagate, but as the patch stands, they would. Just in case a reader might be confused.Thread Previous