Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2011
On 7/11/2011 5:53 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:41:41PM -0700, Reverend Chip wrote:
>
>> The no-common-vars optimization works strictly by name? Feh. Perhaps
>> you're right about the pragma, or perhaps we can just have users use do
>> BLOCK as a workaround since it makes temp copies that can have their
>> contents stolen, reducing the waste:
>>
>> ($original,$something_else) = do { 3,$v };
> I suspect that it can be detected and dealt with at runtime without users
> needing to know, much like Dave managed with acdea6f060081615 for a related
> issue with list assignment.
Obviously this is possible, but do we want every list assignment to have
to build a hash table of SV* values? I would prefer to avoid the
overhead in the overwhelmingly common case.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next