On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:41:41PM -0700, Reverend Chip wrote: > The no-common-vars optimization works strictly by name? Feh. Perhaps > you're right about the pragma, or perhaps we can just have users use do > BLOCK as a workaround since it makes temp copies that can have their > contents stolen, reducing the waste: > > ($original,$something_else) = do { 3,$v }; I suspect that it can be detected and dealt with at runtime without users needing to know, much like Dave managed with acdea6f060081615 for a related issue with list assignment. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next