From:

Date:

July 7, 2011 03:01Subject:

Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove\N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?)Message ID:

20110707120102.2dc9aca0@pc09.procura.nlOn Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:33:17 -0600, Tom Christiansen <tchrist@perl.com> wrote: > 1 = no re /s (traditional and annoying) > 2 = use re /s (necessary but insufficient) > 3 = \V (improved #1) > 4 = \X (improved #2) > 5 = \X unless \R (improved #2, #3) > > See? How often do you guys write the *wrong* one of those? Never > If you are like most of us, almost always. And that’s a problem. To be honest, I more often "forget" that \r and \n are part of \s than that I appear to use . the wrong way. -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using 5.00307 through 5.14 and porting perl5.15.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11, 11.23 and 11.31, OpenSuSE 10.1, 11.0 .. 11.4 and AIX 5.2 and 5.3. http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/Thread Previous | Thread Next

- Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from being experimental? by Karl Williamson
- Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, frombeing experimental ? by Jesse Vincent
- Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from beingexperimental ? by Zsbán Ambrus
- Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by Tom Christiansen
- Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove\N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by Brian Fraser
- Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem by Karl Williamson
**Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove\N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?)**by H.Merijn Brand- Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time toremove \N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by Abigail
- Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem by Johan Vromans
- Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by Tom Christiansen
- Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem by Johan Vromans
- FMTEYEWTK about Unicode Grapheme Matching (was: Solving the *real* Dot Problem) by Tom Christiansen
- Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem by David Golden
- Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, frombeing experimental ? by Abigail
- Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from beingexperimental ? by Karl Williamson

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.

Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About