Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, frombeing experimental ?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:46:40PM -0600, Karl Williamson wrote:
> This "experimental" feature was added in 5.12.  I have heard no
> complaints about it.  The changes would be to strip the pods of
> the marking it experimental.

Is it being used? (Are folks cpanning modules that use it?)

-j

-- 

• Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from being experimental? by Karl Williamson
• Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, frombeing experimental ? by Jesse Vincent
• Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from beingexperimental ? by Zsbán Ambrus
• Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove\N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by Brian Fraser
• Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem by Karl Williamson
• Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove\N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time toremove \N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by Abigail
• Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem by Johan Vromans
• Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem (was: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from being experimental?) by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem by Johan Vromans
• FMTEYEWTK about Unicode Grapheme Matching (was: Solving the *real* Dot Problem) by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Solving the *real* Dot Problem by David Golden
• Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, frombeing experimental ? by Abigail
• Re: Is 5.16 the time to remove \N, the complement of \n, from beingexperimental ? by Karl Williamson